The other day I posted about the .xxx Domain for porn, being on hold. Today a reader forwarded me an email about a website that is offering War Pornography. American soldiers have been using the pictures of disfigured Iraqi corpses as currency to buy pornography.American soldiers have been using the pictures of disfigured Iraqi corpses as currency to buy pornography
The website NowThatsFuckedUp.com offers pictures of people killed in war, as one of the attractions on its newsboard porn site.
Scroll down and you will see this section
As per the email
“…If you want to see the true face of war, go to the amateur porn Web site NowThatsFuckedUp.com. For almost a year, American soldiers stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan have been taking photographs of dead bodies, many of them horribly mutilated or blown to pieces, and sending them to Web site administrator Chris Wilson. In return for letting him post these images, Wilson gives the soldiers free access to his site. American soldiers have been using the pictures of disfigured Iraqi corpses as currency to buy pornography…”
I did not take this email at its word and actually saw the site. The postings are gory. Please don’t see it if you think it will upset and disturb you. It has disturbed me for sure. What really rankles me is how can someone do this. Even if the asshole American soldiers want to post this, why does the owner of the site allow them to do so. And why hasn’t the media taken this up? Just imagine the kind of anger and hatred it will raise when people in the Middle East see this. The audience of Al Jazeera, will ask for blood…American blood. And not only them. Any sane person looking at this will not stay quiet.
The email continues
“…At Wilson’s Web site, you can see an Arab man’s face sliced off and placed in a bowl filled with blood. Another man’s head, his face crusted with dried blood and powder burns, lies on a bed of gravel. A man in a leather coat who apparently tried to run a military checkpoint lies slumped in the driver’s seat of a car, his head obliterated by gunfire, the flaps of skin from his neck blooming open like rose petals. Six men in beige fatigues, identified as US Marines, laugh and smile for the camera while pointing at a burned, charcoal-black corpse lying at their feet…”
And here is some more info of the owner of the site…
“…Wilson, a 27-year-old Web entrepreneur living in Florida, created the Web site a year ago, asked fans to contribute pictures of their wives and girlfriends, and posted footage and photographs bearing titles such as “wife working cock” and “ass fucking my wife on the stairs.” The site was a big hit with soldiers stationed overseas; about a third of his customers, or more than fifty thousand people, work in the military…”
UPDATE 02: Here is the NYTimes Article on this
UPDATE 01: The original article was posted on EASTBAY Express
The text of both articles posted below…
The War Pornographers:
posted on EASTBAY Express
If you want to see the true face of war, go to the amateur porn Website NowThatsFuckedUp.com. For almost a year, American soldiers stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan have been taking photographs of dead bodies, many of them horribly mutilated or blown to pieces, and sending them to Web site administrator Chris Wilson. In return for letting him post these images, Wilson gives the soldiers free access to his site.
American soldiers have been using the pictures of disfigured Iraqi corpses as currency to buy pornography.
At Wilson’s Web site, you can see an Arab man’s face sliced off and placed in a bowl filled with blood. Another man’s head, his face crusted with dried blood and powder burns, lies on a bed of gravel. A man in a leather coat who apparently tried to run a military checkpoint lies slumped in the driver’s seat of a car, his head obliterated by gunfire, the flaps of skin from his neck blooming open like rose petals. Six men in beige fatigues, identified as US Marines, laugh and smile for the camera while pointing at a burned, charcoal-black corpse lying at their feet.
The captions that accompany these images, which were apparently written by the soldiers who posted them, laugh and gloat over the bodies. The soldier who posted a picture of a corpse lying in a pool of his own brains and entrails wrote, “What every Iraqi should look like.” The photograph of a corpse whose jaw has apparently rotted away, leaving a gaping set of upper teeth, bears the caption “bad day for this dude.”
One soldier posted three photographs of corpses lying in the street and titled his collection “DIE HAJI DIE.” The soldiers take pride, even joy, in displaying the dead.
This could become a public-relations catastrophe. The Bush administration claims such sympathy for American war dead that officials have banned the media from photographing flag-draped coffins being carried off cargo planes. Government officials and American media officials have repeatedly denounced the al-Jazeera network for airing grisly footage of Iraqi war casualties and American prisoners of war.
The legal fight over whether to release the remaining photographs of atrocities at Abu Ghraib has dragged on for months, with no less a figure than Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Meyers arguing that the release of such images will inflame the Muslim world and drive ntold numbers to join al-Qaeda. But none of these can compare to the prospect of American troops casually bartering pictures of suffering and death for porn.
“Two years ago, if somebody had said our soldiers would do these things to detainees and take pictures of it, I would have said that’s a lie,” sighed recently retired General Michael Marchand, who as assistant judge advocate general for the Army was responsible for reforming military training policy to make sure nothing like Abu Ghraib ever happens again.
“What soldiers do, I’m not sure I can guess anymore.” But for Chris Wilson, it’s all in a day’s work. “It’s an unedited look at the war from their point of view,” he says of the soldiers who contribute the images.
“There’s always going to be a slant from the news media. … And this is a photo that comes straight from their camera to the site. To me, it’s just a more real look at what’s going on.”
Wilson, a 27-year-old Web entrepreneur living in Florida, created the Web site a year ago, asked fans to contribute pictures of their wives and girlfriends, and posted footage and photographs bearing titles such as “wife working cock” and “ass fucking my wife on the stairs.” The site was a big hit with soldiers stationed overseas; about a third of his customers, or more than fifty thousand people, work in the military.
Wilson says soldiers began e-mailing him, thanking him for keeping up their morale and “bringing a little piece of the States to them.” But other soldiers complained that they had problems buying memberships to his service. “They wanted to join the site, the amateur wife and girlfriend site,” he says. “But they couldn’t, because the addresses associated with their credit cards were Quackistan or something; they were in such a high-risk country that the credit card companies wouldn’t approve the purchase.”
That was when Wilson hit upon the idea of offering free memberships to soldiers. All they had to do was send a picture of life in Iraq or Afghanistan, and they’d get all the free porn they wanted. All sorts of images began appearing over the transom, but he dedicated a special site to view the most “gory”pictures. Asked what he feels upon viewing a new batch, Wilson says: “Personally, I don’t look at it one way or another. It’s newsworthy, and people can form their own opinions.”
One soldier, who would not reveal his name or unit, defended his decision to post pictures of the dead, which he did after returning home. “I had just finished watching the beheading of one of our contractors that was taken hostage over in Iraq,” he wrote in an e-mail. “I figured since that was all over the Web, maybe these pictures would make some potential suicide bomber think twice after seeing what happens AFTER you pull the pin.
“Wat you interpret [as] maliciousness and bravado may be how [soldiers] react to situations where they almost die or they just saw their buddy get killed,” he continued. “I will not defend the people who have posted pictures of dead, innocent Iraqis, but in my opinion, the insurgents/terrorists that try to kill us and end up getting killed in return have absolutely no rights once they are dead.
“Obviously these postings do not help our public image at all,” the soldier concluded. “However, I believe the US has been far too concerned about our public image as of late. … We need to take a much harsher stand against these Islamic fundamentalists and stop giving them the royal American treatment. They need to be taught a lesson, a lesson hard enough that they will think twice before waging a jihad against us.”
Wilson’s Web site has made the news before – but not for posting pictures of murdered people. Last October, the New York Post reported that the Pentagon was investigating him for posting naked pictures of female soldiers in Iraq. After a few months, the Post reported that the Pentagon had blocked soldiers in Iraq from accessing the Web site, which had posted five more pictures of nude female soldiers, some of whom had posed with machine guns and grenades. After the Post’s stories, Wilson says, he was bombarded with requests for interviews from newspapers and radio stations. Even after he began posting photographs of corpses late last year, media inquiries focused exclusively on his nudie pics. It wasn’t until reporters from the European press contacted him last week that anyone took notice of Wilson’s snuff-for-porn arrangement with American troops.
“The soldiers thing, I think the Italians picked it up first,” Wilson says. “I’ve done interviews with the Italians, the French, Amsterdam. … They were very critical, saying the US wouldn’t pick it up, because it’s such a sore spot. … It raises too many ethical questions. … I started to laugh, because it’s true.”
When contacted for this story, a White House spokeswoman said, “If we have a comment, we’ll call you back.” They never did. But according to Army spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Chris Conway, Pentagon policy may be ambivalent when it comes to soldiers posting pictures of mutilated war victims. “There are policies in place that, on the one hand, safeguard sensitive and classified information, and on the other hand protect the First Amendment rights of service members,” he says, adding that field commanders may issue additional directives. “In plain English, if you’re on the job working for the Department of Defense, you shouldn’t be freelancing. You should be doing your duty.”
If American soldiers in the field are always considered representatives of their government, international law clearly prohibits publishing and ridiculing images of war dead. The First Protocol of the Geneva Conventions states that “the remains of persons who have died for reasons related to occupation or in detention resulting from occupation or hostilities … shall be respected, and the gravesites of all such persons shall be respected, maintained, and marked.” The first Geneva Convention also requires that military personnel “shall further ensure that the dead are honorably interred, if possible according to the rites of the religion to which they belonged.” No one can reasonably expect a war without war crimes.
But thanks to modern communications technology, photographic evidence of its brutality will always be with us. Roughly two hundred soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan document their experiences in online “milblogs,” and digital cameras are ubiquitous. No one can stop soldiers from posting pictures of eviscerated corpses for all to see, and no one should ever again be able to feign ignorance of war’s human cost. Or so you’d think. Yet in the days since the European press uncovered the gore-for-porn story, not a single US print newspaper other than the Express has touched it.
Representatives from Amnesty International and Human Rights First even refused to comment, although both organizations ostensibly exist to condemn just this kind of practice. Perhaps no one wants to give Chris Wilson more publicity, or daily editors are too sensitive about being viewed as unpatriotic. Or perhaps the story is just too ugly to contemplate.
Americans have thousands of media outlets to choose from. But they still have to visit a porn site to see what this war has done to the bodies of the dead and the souls of the living. One of the pictures on Wilson’s site depicts a woman whose right leg has been torn off by a land mine, and a medical worker is holding the mangled stump up to the camera. The woman’s vagina is visible under the hem of her skirt. The caption for this picture reads: “Nice puss –– bad foot.”
We have decided to make available some of the photos originally posted on NowThatsFuckedUp.com, along with the soldiers’ original subject headings. This decision was not made lightly, but we concluded that the graphic nature of the photos, juxtaposed with their flippant treatment by members of the US military, is newsworthy. WARNING: These are brutally graphic war images that many readers will find disturbing. They should NOT be viewed by children or the faint of heart. That said, you may find them here. Click on the small photos to view the larger photos with captions.
September 28, 2005
Army Investigates Photos of Iraqi War Dead on Web
By THOM SHANKER, NY Times.com
WASHINGTON, Sept. 27 – The Army has opened an investigation into whether American troops have sent gruesome photographs of Iraqi war dead to an Internet site where the soldiers were given free access to online pornography, Army officials said Tuesday.
Some photographs on the Internet site show people in American military uniforms standing around what appear to be dead bodies. Other photos include graphic images of severed body parts and what appear to be internal organs spilling from bodies onto the ground.
The images are said to come from Afghanistan as well as Iraq. Their authenticity has not been determined.
Paul Boyce, an Army spokesman, said that if soldiers had posted the images, their actions could violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which defines conduct unbecoming an officer or enlisted soldier.
Another Pentagon official who reviewed the Web site said it raised questions, as well, of whether the acts could be viewed as a violation of the Geneva Conventions, which set standards for treatment of remains of those killed in a combat zone.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based civil rights and advocacy group, called for an investigation after details of the photographs were described in news media and online reports.
Arsalan Iftikhar, the group’s legal director, asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to “investigate this troubling phenomenon and do whatever is necessary to bring it to an end.”
On the Web site, the photographs are set aside from the pornographic images that are its standard content. Those who provided the pictures often included crude captions. But there is also some discussion about the war, its purpose and conduct.
Attempts to reach the operator of the Web site on Tuesday were not successful.
An article published last week in the Online Journalism Review of the Annenberg School for Communications at the University of Southern California identified the site’s operator as Chris Wilson, and said he lived in Florida but maintained the site on computer hosts overseas.
The article quoted him as saying: “To me, this is from the soldier’s slant. This is directly from them. They can take the digital cameras and take a picture and send it to me, and that’s the most raw you can get it. I like to see it from their point of view, and I think it’s newsworthy.”
On the site, under the headline “Cooked Iraqi,” a posted photograph shows uniformed men posing in front of what appear to be charred remains. The photo promoted several anonymous postings including one that said, “Burn baby, burn!”
Another contributor had a different reaction: “Yip, its funny when it’s a ‘second rate’ Iraqi, but an outrage when its one of your own,” adding, “Typical and these are the people charged with the responsibility of showing the world how we can improve life in Iraq.”
Officials said the military’s preliminary inquiry was being conducted by the Army Criminal Investigation Command. They said it had proved difficult to identify the military personnel who can be seen in some of the photographs wearing Army or Marine Corps uniforms but no clear name tags or unit markings.
Digital cameras have been ubiquitous in the modern combat zone, and it was digital pictures and videos that provided the first public evidence of the extreme degree to which military police soldiers had abused Iraqi detainees at Abu Ghraib prison.
In the aftermath of Abu Ghraib and reports of other abuses by American troops, Pentagon and military officials acknowledged that such behavior could severely damage the American war effort in Iraq.
“I think it’s really a disturbing phenomenon to see that our military personnel would be engaging in such inappropriate behavior, behavior that brings dishonor to the military,” Ibrahim Hooper, the spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said in a telephone interview.